I created FLINK-21358 [1] (and a PR [2] for it) which we might want to
include in 1.12.2 as well.

Best,
Matthias

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21358
[2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14920

On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:19 PM Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks very much for your replies!
>
> I've been reaching out to the owners of the issues/blockers mentioned
> above. By now, we have
>
> Blocker Issues:
>
>    -
>
>    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21013: fixed
>    -
>
>    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030: estimate to finish
>    by the end of this week, but should not be a release blocker
>
> Best to Include:
>
>    -
>
>    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20417: fixed
>    -
>
>    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20663: estimate to finish
>    by the end of this week, but should not be a release blocker
>    -
>
>    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848: under review
>
>
> Hence, let's target *a feature freeze on Feb. 15, next Monday*!
>
> If there is any concern on anything, please feel free to contact me.
>
> Best
> Yuan
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:38 AM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Fabian and I were investigating strange behavior with stop-with-savepoint
>> not terminating when using the new fromSource to add a source to a job
>> definition. I created FLINK-21323 [1] to cover the issue. This might not
>> be
>> a blocker for 1.12.2 since this bug would have been already around since
>> 1.11, if I'm not mistaken? I wanted to bring this to your attention,
>> anyway. It would be good if someone more familiar with this part of the
>> source code could verify our findings and confirm the severity of the
>> issue.
>>
>> Best,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21323
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:25 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for the 1.12.2 release
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 3:20 AM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Yuan for driving 1.12.2.
>> > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2
>> > >
>> > > One comment about FLINK-21030 [1]: I hope to fix it this week. But
>> there
>> > > are still some uncertainties. The underlying problem is older than
>> 1.12.
>> > > Hence, the suggestion is to not block the 1.12.2 release because of
>> > > FLINK-21030 [1]. I will leave it as a blocker issue, though, to
>> underline
>> > > that it should be fixed for 1.13.
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Matthias
>> > >
>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 4:10 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Thanks Yuan,
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2 and Yuan as the release manager.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you~
>> > > >
>> > > > Xintong Song
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 3:41 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2, and thanks for volunteering to be our
>> > release
>> > > > > manager Yuan.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Besides the mentioned issues, I could see two more blockers with
>> > 1.12.2
>> > > > as
>> > > > > fix version [1] and need some tracking:
>> > > > > * FLINK-21013 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21013>
>> > > Blink
>> > > > > planner does not ingest timestamp into StreamRecord
>> > > > > * FLINK- 21030 <http://Broken job restart for job with disjoint
>> > graph>
>> > > > > Broken
>> > > > > job restart for job with disjoint graph
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best Regards,
>> > > > > Yu
>> > > > >
>> > > > > [1] https://s.apache.org/flink-1.12.2-blockers
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 08:57, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks for being our release manager Yuan.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > We found a out of memory issue [1] which will affect most batch
>> > jobs
>> > > > > thus I
>> > > > > > think
>> > > > > > it would be great if we can include this fix in 1.12.2.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20663
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > Kurt
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 12:36 AM Till Rohrmann <
>> > trohrm...@apache.org>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks for volunteering for being our release manager Yuan :-)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > +1 for a timely bug fix release.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I will try to review the PR for FLINK- 20417 [1] which is a
>> good
>> > > fix
>> > > > to
>> > > > > > > include in the next bug fix release. We don't have to block
>> the
>> > > > release
>> > > > > > on
>> > > > > > > this fix though.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20417
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Cheers,
>> > > > > > > Till
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:12 PM Piotr Nowojski <
>> > > pnowoj...@apache.org>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks Yuan for bringing up this topic.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > +1 for the quick 1.12.2 release.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > As Yuan mentioned, me and Roman can help whenever committer
>> > > rights
>> > > > > will
>> > > > > > > be
>> > > > > > > > required.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long lasting bug
>> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish this
>> would
>> > be
>> > > > > merged
>> > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > this release.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > I will push to speed up review of your PR. Let's try to
>> merge
>> > it
>> > > > > before
>> > > > > > > > 1.12.2, but at the same time I wouldn't block the release on
>> > this
>> > > > > bug.
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > > > Piotrek
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > pt., 5 lut 2021 o 12:12 郁蓝 <happyhacker...@foxmail.com>
>> > > > napisał(a):
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hi Yuan,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long lasting bug
>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish this
>> would
>> > > be
>> > > > > > merged
>> > > > > > > > in
>> > > > > > > > > this release.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Best wishes
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > ------------------&nbsp;原始邮件&nbsp;------------------
>> > > > > > > > > 发件人:
>> > > > > > > > >                                                   "dev"
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > >  <
>> > > > > > > > > yuanmei.w...@gmail.com&gt;;
>> > > > > > > > > 发送时间:&nbsp;2021年2月5日(星期五) 晚上6:36
>> > > > > > > > > 收件人:&nbsp;"dev"<dev@flink.apache.org&gt;;
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > 主题:&nbsp;[DISCUSS] Releasing Apache Flink 1.12.2
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Hey devs,
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > One of the major issues that have not been resolved in
>> Apache
>> > > > Flink
>> > > > > > > > 1.12.1
>> > > > > > > > > is "unaligned
>> > > > > > > > > checkpoint recovery may lead to corrupted data stream"[1].
>> > > Since
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > > problem is now fixed and
>> > > > > > > > > it is critical to the users, I would like to kick off a
>> > > > discussion
>> > > > > on
>> > > > > > > > > releasing Flink 1.12.2 that
>> > > > > > > > > includes unaligned checkpoint fixes.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > I would like to volunteer myself for managing this
>> release.
>> > > But I
>> > > > > > > noticed
>> > > > > > > > > that some of the release
>> > > > > > > > > steps may require committer authorities. Luckily, Piotr
>> and
>> > > Roman
>> > > > > are
>> > > > > > > > very
>> > > > > > > > > kind to provide help
>> > > > > > > > > on such steps.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Apart from the unaligned checkpoint issue, please let us
>> know
>> > > in
>> > > > > this
>> > > > > > > > > thread if there are any
>> > > > > > > > > other fixes that we should try to include in this version.
>> > I'll
>> > > > try
>> > > > > > to
>> > > > > > > > > communicate with the issue
>> > > > > > > > > owners and come up with a time estimation next week.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20654
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Best
>> > > > > > > > > Yuan
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>
>

Reply via email to