Oh, I misunderstood option-1 and option-2. What I vote is Jason's option-1.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:19 AM Jason Huynh <jhu...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Gester, I don't think we need to write in the old format, we just need the > new format not to be written while old members can potentially read the > lucene files. Option 1 can be very similar to Dan's snippet of code. > > I think Option 2 is going to leave a lot of people unhappy when they get > stuck with what Mario is experiencing right now and all we can say is "you > should have read the doc". Not to say Option 2 isn't valid and it's > definitely the least amount of work to do, I still vote option 1. > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 5:16 PM Xiaojian Zhou <gz...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > Usually re-creating region and index are expensive and customers are > > reluctant to do it, according to my memory. > > > > We do have an offline reindex scripts or steps (written by Barry?). If > that > > could be an option, they can try that offline tool. > > > > I saw from Mario's email, he said: "I didn't found a way to write lucene > in > > older format. They only support > > reading old format indexes with newer version by using lucene-backward- > > codec." > > > > That's why I think option-1 is not feasible. > > > > Option-2 will cause the queue to be filled. But usually customer will > hold > > on, silence or reduce their business throughput when > > doing rolling upgrade. I wonder if it's a reasonable assumption. > > > > Overall, after compared all the 3 options, I still think option-2 is the > > best bet. > > > > Regards > > Gester > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 3:38 PM Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 6, 2019, at 3:36 PM, Jason Huynh <jhu...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > > > > > > Jake - there is a side effect to this in that the user would have to > > > > reimport all their data into the user defined region too. Client > apps > > > > would also have to know which of the regions to put into.. also, I > may > > be > > > > misunderstanding this suggestion, completely. In either case, I'll > > > support > > > > whoever implements the changes :-P > > > > > > Ah… there isn’t a way to re-index the existing data. Eh… just a > thought. > > > > > > -Jake > > > > > > > > >
