-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stefan Arentz wrote: | ... | | Security-wise it is also a nightmare. There is so much stuff running in | the container that I have no idea of. I usually bind the instance to | localhost and do port translation for those TCP/IP services that need | to be exposed, but even then there are still many ways to connect to it | from localhost that could potentially expose information or give | control to unauthorized people. | | S. | Exactly. And seeing another huge "everything to everyone" server is why I never got motivated to do more than observe Geronimo. I'd be better served keeping up on what I have to do to keep my existing 'monolith' as secure as possible. If it can be broken down, re-arranged, reassembled - and still "just work", it would be THE server to use - not just "another" server.
Brian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCl2kZaCoPKRow/gARAtT0AKDTGdqFdKGwhwMqVOmsSGkKPLXkXgCeL2vr ua9uF67yfhbZMVPcztRL7IM= =qcty -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
