On 9/25/07, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Erik, Jason and Viet, Today I've updated the "Apache Geronimo > Development > Tools Subproject" website (below) to include the latest information about > the > new release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin. > > ---> http://geronimo.apache.org/development-tools.html
Excellent. I'll take a look and let you know if there are any issues. I've also included some information about the J2G Migration tool from some > of > the notes in this thread. Since I don't know a lot about this new tool, > I'm > hoping you all might review what I have thus far to see if it's kinda what > you > all had envisioned. Also, every Sunday I push out the latest trunk build > of the > Geronimo Eclipse plugin to our unstable site (below). I've assumed it's > okay to > do the same for the J2G plugin as well and have listed it in the downloads > sections. > > ---> http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/eclipse/unstable/ That's not just okay, it's fantastic. Thanks for doing that. Regards, Jason Warner Thanks > > > Erik B. Craig wrote: > > All, > > > > After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g (usable > > from within the Eclipse IDE UI, Annotations support, improved > > logging/information output, support for EJB 3), as well as a bit of > > interest out in the general open source community in moving applications > > from Jboss to Geronimo (such as today's inquiry on theserverside.com > > <http://theserverside.com>), I feel as though it would be of some > > benefit to have j2g, at least the content in our confluence wiki ( > > http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/j2g-migration-tool.html) linked > > somewhere on the actual geronimo homepage. I was thinking either as it's > > own link under 'Subprojects', much as Development Tools, GBuild, or > > XBean are situated, or as an addition inside the Development Tools page, > > much as the current Eclipse Plug-in section rests within there. > > > > I am willing to commit to doing a bit of additional writing (beyond what > > is on the wiki) if it were to be under it's own section, or a subsection > > of development tools if necessary, but I think it would be good to get > > it up and out there sooner rather than later, especially to coincide > > with the recent release of 2.0.1 to perhaps show those out there > > remotely interested in migrating, there are tools available to assist > > and perhaps 'hold their hand' a bit. > > > > > > Thoughts? Comments? Objections? > > > > Thanks > > -- > > Erik B. Craig > > -- > Thanks, > Tim McConnell >