Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1 samples - branches

[Donald Woods]

I'd like to see us keep a branches/2.0 and branches/2.1 around, so people can continue to add and enhance the samples if they wish....

-Donald

Joe Bohn wrote:

We have the following branches in samples:
- geronimo/samples/branches/1.0


- geronimo/samples/branches/2.0

Newly added for the migration samples. We'll see what happens with this branch. We don't have the other 1.0 samples (were there any?) checked in. This includes the samples for the 2.0.* server stream. It includes jsp-examples and servlet-examples but those are not the ones that we released with the 2.0.x releases which are included with the server at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/2.0.2/applications/geronimo-examples. We need to keep the branch but I'm wondering if we should remove the jsp & servlet examples from it since the "real" copies are in the tagged server svn repos.

- geronimo/samples/branches/2.0-M2


- geronimo/samples/branches/2.1


- geronimo/samples/trunk

I'm not sure why this branch is around. I think it was an initial experiment for the archetype as it contains just that and the calculator-stateless-pojo example. I think this branch should be deleted. This was created when the 2.1 server was released. We need this for the 2.1 stream and I think we need to release this soon. This brings up another question ... Do we release the 2.1 samples (like we did for server) and keep a branch for 2.1.x-SNAPSHOT or do we just release the samples and assert that if something breaks the samples it should not be included in a subsequent 2.1.x server release? Current trunk for 2.2 (just like the server trunk). Definitely need to keep this and ensure that appropriate changes are reflected from 2.1.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature