As you mentioned, 2.1.3 is supposed to be security fixes so I guess I won't look at port it back to 2.1.3. I'll look at pull it back to 2.1.x after 2.1.3 is released. Thanks
Lin On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How much longer would it take to back port to 2.1.3, test the changes and > update the 2.1 Docs? > Could you wrap it all up by next Friday (Sept. 5th)? > > > -Donald > > > Lin Sun wrote: >> >> I've made quite some changes to the custom server assembly portlet - >> check it out. I've tested some of these profile combinations, such >> as Web by deploying the tomcat jsp example, Web + JMS + EJB by >> deploying and running the calculator example and Web + web >> services(Axis2) by deploying and running the jaxws-calculator example. >> I am not sure if we want to pull these into v2.1.3? >> >> Lin >> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Time to start the discussion on winding down changes and preparing for a >>> Geronimo 2.1.3 release. >>> >>> Server fixes/enhancements are listed on the Release Status page - >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-213-release-status.html >>> >>> Details on included security fixes in dependent components are listed on >>> the >>> Security page - >>> http://geronimo.apache.org/21x-security-report.html >>> >>> >>> The only additional changes that I know of right now for 2.1.3 are Joe's >>> "compatibility plugins/artifact alias" changes. >>> >>> >>> Does anyone have additional fixes they would like to include in 2.1.3 >>> before >>> we cut the branch and start the release process? >>> >>> >>> >>> -Donald >>> >> >
