2006/11/24, Alexey Varlamov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/11/24, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 23 Nov 2006 19:44:23 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > 2006/11/23, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > 23 Nov 2006 16:34:22 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > > > > 2006/11/23, Vladimir Strigun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > On 23 Nov 2006 14:37:09 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Strigun wrote: > > > > > > > > > The numbers that I published was received on P4 under Windows + > > > > > > > > > server.emconf +Harmony-1980. Unfortunately I haven't run Dacapo under > > > > > > > > > x86_64, but I hope we could receive almost the same range (10-20 % > > > > > > > > > slower that Sun) with the mentioned configuration. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And Sun was running with "-server" too I guess? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe, it is time to track performance comparisons of *different > > > > > > > > platforms* in one place? That should help to avoid major differences in > > > > > > > > our visions for harmony performance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, good idea. Should we define the configuration for all VM's as well? > > > > > > > For instance, for Sun we could use parameters from spec site. What do > > > > > > > you think about it? > > > > > > +1 for options from spec site. > > > > > > > > > > I am in love with it too. We could present results similar to how > > > > > spec.org does. Just a list of runs. > > > > > For each: > > > > > * revision number > > > > > * hardware/os summary (number of cores) > > > > > * link to full details > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > * more? > > > > > > > > score? :) > > > > oops :) > > > > > Scores are most visible things but we can not easily publish them for > > > all specs... > > not allowed -> won't publish. We have great free benchmarks (thanks to > > DaCapo guys!), they will give us a good picture. > But I think that we should keep these (spec) benchmarks in mind and > optimize Harmony for them. For the *default* mode?
No. For server mode.
SY, Alexey
