The guy we had looking at streaming replication moved on and there's no immediate plans to take on the work, FWIW
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Matteo Bertozzi <theo.berto...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was shooting for summer for hbase 2.0, the main problem is that there is > still no code for the new AM or for fs changes, which are the two that may > impact compatibility (working slowly on that). Streaming replication and > others seems compatible enough but no code there too. > > Matteo > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Agreed. I just meant - readiness of 2.0 is something affecting decisions > on > > whether or not to backport mobs to branch-1 (which is itself separate > > thread). > > > > -Mikhail > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > - "Shouldn't we rather try to get 2.0 release out and have mobs > > there". > > > - > > > > So how far do we feel 2.0 release is? > > > > > > > > > > 2.0 readiness probably deserves its own [DISCUSS] thread, but we're now > > > past a year since the HBase 1.0.0 release, so I hope it's soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > Michael Antonov > > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
