I'm starting a push at work to get us up on 1.2. Assuming that happens later this year I think that will be the end of my close attention to 0.98.
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In the meantime those of us running HBase in production would benefit from >> fairly frequent minor releases. > > +1. Having to look back to 0.98 to get some new feature is problematic. > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I disagree. We have agreed that 2.0 will have a new assignement manager. >>> There's a lot of work that has been done on getting that in, so far there >>> are no benefits to the end user from all that work. We should stick with >>> the plan and release 2.0 when it's ready. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Stephen Jiang <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for Mikhail for taking the 1.3 RM role. Looks like we have a >> lot >>> of >>>> new things in 1.3 release. >>>> >>>> Based on the experience of 1.1 and 1.2 release, it takes a lot of >> efforts >>>> to get a stable minor release out. From this, I have my own 2-cents on >>> 1.4 >>>> release. The plan is to have 2.0 release during summer time of this >> year >>>> (yeah, *this year). * Given the limited time and resource, after 1.3 >>>> release, instead of spending effort on 1.4 release, the community >> should >>>> focus on stabilizing master (or branch-2, not exist as of now) branch >> and >>>> make 2.0 release a priority. 2.0 release would bring more values to >>>> customer & move towards maturity of HBASE product. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Stephen >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mikhail Antonov <[email protected] >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Created an umbrella jira for 1.3 release - HBASE-15341 >>>>> >>>>> So it looks like we may have 1.4 release before 2.0 is out? I tried >> to >>>> add >>>>> 1.4 version in jira so we can keep it in branch-1 poms but I >> couldn't - >>>>> looks like I don't have permissions? >>>>> >>>>> -Mikhail >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The guy we had looking at streaming replication moved on and >> there's >>> no >>>>>> immediate plans to take on the work, FWIW >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Matteo Bertozzi < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I was shooting for summer for hbase 2.0, the main problem is that >>>> there >>>>>> is >>>>>>> still no code for the new AM or for fs changes, which are the two >>>> that >>>>>> may >>>>>>> impact compatibility (working slowly on that). Streaming >>> replication >>>>> and >>>>>>> others seems compatible enough but no code there too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matteo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Agreed. I just meant - readiness of 2.0 is something affecting >>>>>> decisions >>>>>>> on >>>>>>>> whether or not to backport mobs to branch-1 (which is itself >>>> separate >>>>>>>> thread). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Mikhail >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sean Busbey < >>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Mikhail Antonov < >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - "Shouldn't we rather try to get 2.0 release out and have >>>> mobs >>>>>>>> there". >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>> So how far do we feel 2.0 release is? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2.0 readiness probably deserves its own [DISCUSS] thread, but >>>> we're >>>>>> now >>>>>>>>> past a year since the HBase 1.0.0 release, so I hope it's >> soon. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Sean >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Michael Antonov >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> - Andy >>>>>> >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >>>> Hein >>>>>> (via Tom White) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Michael Antonov >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >>
