On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> In the meantime those of us running HBase in production would benefit from > fairly frequent minor releases. > +1. Having to look back to 0.98 to get some new feature is problematic. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I disagree. We have agreed that 2.0 will have a new assignement manager. > > There's a lot of work that has been done on getting that in, so far there > > are no benefits to the end user from all that work. We should stick with > > the plan and release 2.0 when it's ready. > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Stephen Jiang <syuanjiang...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for Mikhail for taking the 1.3 RM role. Looks like we have a > lot > > of > > > new things in 1.3 release. > > > > > > Based on the experience of 1.1 and 1.2 release, it takes a lot of > efforts > > > to get a stable minor release out. From this, I have my own 2-cents on > > 1.4 > > > release. The plan is to have 2.0 release during summer time of this > year > > > (yeah, *this year). * Given the limited time and resource, after 1.3 > > > release, instead of spending effort on 1.4 release, the community > should > > > focus on stabilizing master (or branch-2, not exist as of now) branch > and > > > make 2.0 release a priority. 2.0 release would bring more values to > > > customer & move towards maturity of HBASE product. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Stephen > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Created an umbrella jira for 1.3 release - HBASE-15341 > > > > > > > > So it looks like we may have 1.4 release before 2.0 is out? I tried > to > > > add > > > > 1.4 version in jira so we can keep it in branch-1 poms but I > couldn't - > > > > looks like I don't have permissions? > > > > > > > > -Mikhail > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > The guy we had looking at streaming replication moved on and > there's > > no > > > > > immediate plans to take on the work, FWIW > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Matteo Bertozzi < > > > > theo.berto...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I was shooting for summer for hbase 2.0, the main problem is that > > > there > > > > > is > > > > > > still no code for the new AM or for fs changes, which are the two > > > that > > > > > may > > > > > > impact compatibility (working slowly on that). Streaming > > replication > > > > and > > > > > > others seems compatible enough but no code there too. > > > > > > > > > > > > Matteo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Mikhail Antonov < > > > olorinb...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed. I just meant - readiness of 2.0 is something affecting > > > > > decisions > > > > > > on > > > > > > > whether or not to backport mobs to branch-1 (which is itself > > > separate > > > > > > > thread). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mikhail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Sean Busbey < > > bus...@cloudera.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Mikhail Antonov < > > > > > olorinb...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - "Shouldn't we rather try to get 2.0 release out and have > > > mobs > > > > > > > there". > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > So how far do we feel 2.0 release is? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.0 readiness probably deserves its own [DISCUSS] thread, but > > > we're > > > > > now > > > > > > > > past a year since the HBase 1.0.0 release, so I hope it's > soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Michael Antonov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > > Hein > > > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael Antonov > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
