On Sat, 2018-02-03 at 10:21 +0000, sebb wrote: > On 2 February 2018 at 17:41, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-02-02 at 17:05 +0000, sebb wrote: > > > On 2 February 2018 at 13:33, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 20:18 +0000, sebb wrote: > > > > > It may not be pretty, but I find it legible and generally > > > > > easy to > > > > > navigate so I hope those attributes won't be lost. > > > > > > > > > > Also, it's important not to break any links. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is also important to eat healthy, be polite and stay away > > > > from > > > > those > > > > girls. > > > > > > > > I am sorry, Sebastian, but links are likely to get broken and > > > > some > > > > > > It's not necessary to change the site design. > > > Nor is it necessary to drop Maven. > > > > > > > Of course not, as long as some other poor sucker has to maintain > > that > > site. > > > > > I think links are a lot more more important than looks. > > > > > > > This is not so much about the look of the site being terrible > > (which is > > a consequence, not a cause) but about the way the site gets > > generated > > is terrible. > > In what way is it terrible?
Being terribly broken makes it terrible, does it not? > And does that have anything to do with Markdown? Like, better tools tend to use markdown. > > > Have you ever wondered why there has been literally not a single > > contribution to our web site from an external contributor? > > > > Have you ever wondered why there have been only two substantial > > contributions to our documentation in the past 10 years? I suspect > > the > > reason is the same. > > There are lots of reasons why people don't contribute documentation. Absolutely. But twisted and broken tooling that generates hideous looking content does not really help, does it? Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
