On 2001-09-01 at 18h19, possibly To [EMAIL PROTECTED] et al., the keyboard of "Ryan Bloom" chattered: > > 3) I don't believe that we > should be adding every possible module to the core distribution. I > personally think we should leave the core as minimal as possible, and > only add more modules if they implement a part of the HTTP spec. I strongly disagree with that concept. Incredibly strongly. :-) I think module inclusion eligibility should be based on utility and support, and not on anything as limited as protocol relativity. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Graham Leggett
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ian Holsman
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Jerry Baker
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Padwa, Daniel
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Eli Marmor
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Greg Stein
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Sander Striker
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Peter J. Cranstone
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Günter Knauf