Hi, >From what I have seen on the list I am on the +1 side of adding mod_gz(ip) to the distribution. Ofcourse, my vote doesn't count since I don't have httpd commit. I find the following arguments convincing (summarized): - The gzip content encoding is part of the HTTP spec. - Most clients support gzip transfer coding. - It is a real solution to the problem of network bandwidth being the limiting factor on many heavily-loaded web servers and on thin-piped clients. - It makes the compression transparent to the admin of the site and allows for dynamically generated content (which can grow quite large) to be compressed aswell. I haven't seen anything that held on the negative side yet. Sander
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Eli Marmor
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Greg Stein
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Sander Striker
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Peter J. Cranstone
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Günter Knauf
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Günter Knauf
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Greg Stein
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ian Holsman
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom