Doug MacEachern wrote: > we're in the 9th month of year 2001, i saw the first glimpse of a '2.0' > server in early 1996 (rob thau's), i have no problem waiting longer for > bug fixes, performance, "doing things right", etc., but there is no good > reason to add new modules or big features at this point. they should wait > for 2.1+. Then where is the v2.1 development tree? v2.0 represents the latest bleeding egde server development. Until a v2.1 development tree exists then there is no choice but to commit things to v2.0. Regards, Graham -- ----------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon over Bourbon Street tonight..."
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Greg Stein
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ask Bjoern Hansen