Doug MacEachern wrote:
> we're in the 9th month of year 2001, i saw the first glimpse of a '2.0'
> server in early 1996 (rob thau's), i have no problem waiting longer for
> bug fixes, performance, "doing things right", etc., but there is no good
> reason to add new modules or big features at this point. they should wait
> for 2.1+.
Then where is the v2.1 development tree?
v2.0 represents the latest bleeding egde server development. Until a
v2.1 development tree exists then there is no choice but to commit
things to v2.0.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Greg Stein
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ask Bjoern Hansen
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature