Doug MacEachern wrote:
> for new modules? no, you create a separate tree for the new module
> (either on apache.org or sourceforge or your own laptop or wherever).
> if the httpd-2.0 tree needs tweaking for smooth integration of a new
> module, that's fine.
That's wonderful news for users. No longer do they download the tarball,
build it, and enable the features they want, now they trawl the web
looking for this module and that module - assuming they even know the
modules exist in the first place.
We need to keep things simple from a user perspective, and not just
focus on keeping things simple from a developers perspective.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Greg Stein
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ryan Bloom
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Doug MacEachern
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Graham Leggett
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: zlib inclusion and mod_gz(ip) recap TOKILEY
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature