On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Jon Travis wrote:
> I've got a bit of code that needs to run after a connection to a client
> has been closed. Right now I can (kind of) spoof this by setting the
> keepalive for the client to 0, and registering a cleanup on the
> request_req pool. Unfortunately the code in there is somewhat bulky,
> so any subsequent cleanups that it registers will never get called
> (apparently registering a cleanup within a cleanup no workie).
>
> I'd like to propose a new hook which gets run after connection to
> the client has been closed. (in my case, I run some cleanup code
> which can take a while, and would like the client to be on its way).
Why can't you just register a cleanup on c->pool instead of r->pool?
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA