On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 06:52:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2) move the ap_lingering_close inside ap_process_connection, then call it
> > from with ap_process_connection. This *almost* works. All MPMs have a
> > call to ap_process_connection followed by a call to ap_lingering_close.
> > The only MPM that does other funny stuff in there is the winnt MPM.
> > Conceivably, you could pass a flag that says "I'll manage the shutdown,
> > thankyouvermuch", and winnt would do its close followed by the
> > post-connection hook.
>
> It is nice for ap_lingering_close() to be handled in the MPM. It
> shouldn't be too hard for the MPM to implement its own lingering close
> in a manner that doesn't consume one thread per closing connection
> (e.g., dedicate one thread per MPM to do all the lingering close
> logic). Of course there could always be another hook :)
Great idea, and yes: switching to a hook would still provide for a complex
lingering close capability.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
