From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:22 PM
> On Thursday 13 December 2001 11:05 am, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > > Couple of bits. If we declare handler_fn identically to a hook_handler > > callback, then we can maintain the semantics. A handler could raise it's > > hand, but later DECLINE. If it DECLINEs, or handler_fn is NULL, then we > > proceed with the usual walk. > > Why don't we go back to the original model, where a handler function is > associated with a handler-name, and the core just calls the correct one? And reintroduce more strcasecmps and fnmatches :-? Let's drop handler and leave nothing but handler_fn if you like. Very deterministic. It's bold, it's brash, it's hip :) Seriously, when on earth was it strictly associated with a modules name? both mod_mmap_static and core registered for "*/*", and core got it if mmap didn't have it (DECLINED.) It's always been a hook. Bill
