"William A. Rowe, Jr." wrote: > > It would be rather cool, however, to have and index.html > and full.html in one place, and not rely on QUERY_STRING > so much.
*shrug* Go ahead and break it apart -- but only if you personally commit to keep all the pieces in sync, and easily accessible/printable both as separate and as a single document.. > Especially one that is (in the minds of most implementors) > malformed. That is *such* a load of crap. 'Most implementors' my foot. If you don't like something, OtherBill, please don't act as though you represent the industry when you express that dislike. > A number of technologies might barf on ?ONEPAGE, while > they have no problem with ?ONEPAGE=1. Anything that barfs on '?token' and will only work with '?token=value' is seriously, seriously broken. Can you name some of these 'technologies'? There is a wealth of reference material that somehow fails to support the idea that valueless tokens are 'malformed'; for starters: RFC 2396 §3.4 <URL:ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2396.txt> Original CGI spec (such as it is): <URL:http://hoohoo.ncsa.uiuc.edu/cgi/env.html#query> <URL:http://hoohoo.ncsa.uiuc.edu/cgi/cl.html> The still-evaolving 'new' CGI spec: <URL:http://cgi-spec.golux.com/draft-coar-cgi-v11-03-clean.html#6.1.8> <URL:http://cgi-spec.golux.com/draft-coar-cgi-v11-03-clean.html#5.0> Just where on Earth did you *get* this idea, anyway? -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millenium hand and shrimp!"
