On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:12:07PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Have there been any complaints about how 1.3 has been doing it for > ages? A 'make install; <foo>/bin/apachectl start' no matter who does > the building has "always" resulted in at least a somewhat functional > server. I don't see the reason for stopping a traditional behavior > (and a possible expectation from the community) without more > compelling reasons.
On the contrary, I don't believe we have an obligation to follow 1.3 here. I think what we are doing for 2.0 makes the most sense. The default is the default. Please don't muddle things based on who is compiling it. -- justin
