Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:12:07PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Have there been any complaints about how 1.3 has been doing it for > > ages? A 'make install; <foo>/bin/apachectl start' no matter who does > > the building has "always" resulted in at least a somewhat functional > > server. I don't see the reason for stopping a traditional behavior > > (and a possible expectation from the community) without more > > compelling reasons. > > On the contrary, I don't believe we have an obligation to follow > 1.3 here. I think what we are doing for 2.0 makes the most sense. > > The default is the default. Please don't muddle things based on > who is compiling it. -- justin >
It's not just who is compiling it, but who is installing it, I thought. As long as it's a documented change from how 1.3 does things, it's really a minor point :) +0 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
