Jess M. Holle wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> At 11:54 AM 8/29/2002, Jess M. Holle wrote:
>>
>>> Jason Kissinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) responded:
>>>
>>>> Windows clients hitting Solaris servers does not exhibit this
>>>> problem. Only Solaris clients hitting Windows servers. I'm unsure
>>>> if other UN*X have this problem, Linux and Windows does not. And
>>>> Solaris client hitting anything but Windows works fine. We have
>>>> some HP/UX boxes that I could build wget on to test as clients, if
>>>> that would be helpful.
>>>
>>>
>> Do the Windows boxes have the Quality of Service (QoS) Network Drivers
>> installed? Are they running any firewall software? Are there any
>> unpatched
>> XP boxes with the AFD.SYS fault lying around?
>
>
> I don't know the answers to any of these questions.
>
> I do know that this occurs on multiple networks, i.e. ours and our
> customers, so whatever it is is not at all unusual. As such it would be
> great if either Apache was fixed or the necessary fixes to the Windows
> and/or Solaris configurations when this occurs were fully documented :-)
>
> Has anyone gotten *good* (e.g. something on par with 8MB/sec) download
> performance with an Apache server on Windows and a Solaris client? [Is
> there a counter-example to prove that this poor performance is not
> always true of this combination -- without cranking the ack interval to
> unreal values, that is.]
>
I'll try to get a simple test going from my laptop tomorrow.
can you tell me what solaris version/update you are running.
you are downloading a >single< large file right
> --
> Jess Holle
>
