Bill Stoddard wrote:
An opinion not without merit. Do other folks feel similarly? (or maybe Bill want's to put more words into the negative space).I am -0 for including it in the httpd repository.
Thomas Eibner wrote:
I don't, but repositories with no community and bad license markup aren't what we're here for.Why would you want to retire it?
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just to keep people posted. I checked with Ryan and:1. The code is most assuredly under the Apache License. 2. Ryan is fine with it being merged into httpd 3. The code is 100% assigned to the ASF.
Thanks for doing the leg work. Daniel Lopez wrote:
I'd like to integrate it. I guess the best location for now is experimental/ ?Excellent. Experimental seems right to me.
I'd proceed...
... but If some other folks want to get into the -0 zone, then we certainly should chat about it some more.
- ben
