At 02:43 PM 1/25/2003, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote: >HI, > >3)Why for instance, could this not stay as a seperate module?? >If suddenly new modules are added that do are not for the >main purpose, I also know various other modules that should >be included.
By 'module' do you mean seperate CVS module (I'm guessing so.) The license is fixed - on the other matter that this is a very cool example but underpowered (as Harrie points out) I really believe that its current home is just fine. No rush to move it to experimental. I'd really like to see us start dropping new work right into their eventual homes within the modules tree. They can stay on 2.1-dev (odd) versions till at least the authors are happy with what they do. So -0 on moving this to modules/experimental. +0 on moving this now to modules/pop (provided we don't pick it up until it is 'blessed' as ready for httpd-2.0 or httpd-2.2.) +1 for it's current repository. Bill
