On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 10:09 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:43 PM 1/25/2003, Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
HI,
3)Why for instance, could this not stay as a seperate module??
If suddenly new modules are added that do are not for the
main purpose, I also know various other modules that should
be included.
By 'module' do you mean seperate CVS module (I'm guessing so.)
yes, seperate CVS module/package.
The license is fixed - on the other matter that this is a very cool
example but underpowered (as Harrie points out) I really believe
that its current home is just fine.
No rush to move it to experimental. I'd really like to see us start
dropping new work right into their eventual homes within the
modules tree. They can stay on 2.1-dev (odd) versions till at
least the authors are happy with what they do.
After sending my message away, I thought of this. Was the
way forward not to make a modular way in which you
had a based (server core) and plugin modules??
Merging this would be an opposite approach.
Harrie
------------------------------------------------------------------
Author of MOD-SNMP, enabling SNMP management of Apache HTTP server
