On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:46:26PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Why 1.4? What will 1.4 have that 1.3 does not? Or do you mean > reopening 1.3 implies that it becomes 1.4?
Only semantics. .4 is even, so stable; .5 is development and less stable > +1 for "officially" allowing active development on 1.3 > -1 for 1.4/1.5 "just because" +1 for more active development on 1.x no matter what it's called. We're on the same page. Cheers, Glenn
