--On Sunday, November 16, 2003 4:04 PM -0500 Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:46:26PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Why 1.4? What will 1.4 have that 1.3 does not? Or do you mean
reopening 1.3 implies that it becomes 1.4?

Only semantics. .4 is even, so stable; .5 is development and less stable

Our versioning policy only applies to 2.x series, not 1.x. -- justin

Reply via email to