Hi, guys Good news is I track down another author now. We are talking about the license questions now, so far so good :)
Thanks > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Chris Darroch" <chr...@pearsoncmg.com> > 发送时间: 2009年1月1日 星期四 > 收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org > 抄送: > 主题: Re: mod_fcgid license questions > > Hi -- > > > On 31 Dec 2008, at 05:48, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > >>> Foes anyone have a sense of whether these would indeed require > >>> a CLA and SGA? > >> > >> They look like simple repairs to me. More importantly, if he thinks > >> they are simple repairs and he is happy to see them Apache Licensed, > >> then there is no need for a CLA or software grant. > > > > +1. This is in the same ballpark as third-party patches we routinely > > accept, e.g. from reports in bugzilla. > > OK, that sounds reasonable. I think we're just waiting to hear > from one other person, then. > > Chris. > > -- > GPG Key ID: 366A375B > GPG Key Fingerprint: 485E 5041 17E1 E2BB C263 E4DE C8E3 FA36 366A 375B >
