----- Original Message ----- > On 04 Jul 2011, at 11:11 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > > >> mod_ldap - An LDAP shared memory cache > >> mod_authnz_ldap - A user of the LDAP shared memory cache > >> > >> The LDAP API exposes way more functionality than mod_ldap exposes, > >> so while you may have fixed the problem for the special case that > >> is > >> mod_authnz_ldap, you won't have fixed the problem for any other > >> module that makes LDAP calls directly. > > > > I don't see how this can be the basis of a veto. You are stating > > that > > there exists a problem which this change does not fix; but that > > problem > > existed in the status quo ante, and it *was not the problem this > > change > > was intended to fix*. > > I have already stated the basis for the veto: every single apparent > flaw in the apr_ldap code that caused wrowe to remove it from APR is > still present in the code that wrowe dumped into httpd. If it's not
It is, fortunately, not in httpd's core. It's in mod_ldap. > good enough for APR, it is not good enough for httpd, period. As far as we've figured out so far, mod_ldap is the only consumer. It might not be good enough for APR or httpd, but it's good enough for mod_ldap. > APR-util > contains abstraction libraries for LDAP, SQL, dbm, XML, and crypto, > and now you want to move one abstraction library to an httpd module? > What were you thinking? > > The httpd build is broken on virtually every platform, and is still > broken more than a month later. That alone is grounds for a veto. > > The httpd project will not be held to ransom by a small group of > people who break the build in an effort to get others to fix it. This > code is vetoed, remove the code immediately. > > Regards, > Graham > -- > > -- Igor Galić Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883 Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org URL: http://brainsware.org/
