All informative feedback is welcome on this /discussion/ thread. Jim, again, stop. Bullying list watchers with negative feedback into silence is a CoC violation.
David, thank you for your detailed feedback. We are reading, whether the feedback is warmly received or not. On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > >> On Apr 19, 2018, at 11:55 AM, David Zuelke <dzue...@salesforce.com> wrote: >> >> >> I hate to break this to you, and I do not want to discredit the >> amazing work all the contributors here are doing, but httpd 2.4 is of >> miserable, miserable quality when it comes to breaks and regressions. >> > > Gee Thanks! That is an amazing compliment to be sure. I have > NO idea how ANYONE could take that in any way as discrediting > the work being done. > > Sarcasm aside, could we do better? Yes. Can we do better? Yes. > Should we do better? Yes. Will we do better? Yes. > > BTW, you DID see how h2 actually came INTO httpd, didn't you?? >
