On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 2:34 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 8, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: >> >> I would far rather the empty APLOGNO check was part of the build. >> >> Vastly simpler. > > > I agree w/ that...
I for one prefer post processing of APLOGNO()s, if `make` started to fail because of that while coding (i.e. while adding/removing APLOGNO()s when "playing" with the code) it would be a pain IMO. So I prefer our ci failing occasionally because one[1] forgot a final `make update-log-tags` (the fix is easy and no one is really blocked by this in the meantime) rather than more work with APLOGNO()s while coding. Regards; Yann. [1] well, mainly Stefan but he's doing (other) great things by the way :)
