On 3/9/22 1:11 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 2:34 PM Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 7:58 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would far rather the empty APLOGNO check was part of the build.
>>>
>>> Vastly simpler.
>>
>>
>> I agree w/ that...
>
> I for one prefer post processing of APLOGNO()s, if `make` started to
> fail because of that while coding (i.e. while adding/removing
> APLOGNO()s when "playing" with the code) it would be a pain IMO.
> So I prefer our ci failing occasionally because one[1] forgot a final
> `make update-log-tags` (the fix is easy and no one is really blocked
> by this in the meantime) rather than more work with APLOGNO()s while
> coding.
Big +1 to this.
Regards
Rüdiger
