From my perspective we should move towards existing UX approaches. For
example:
python - enters shell
python --help - prints help
python -c - executes command
What about other CLI tools that works with remote services? I can't
remember properly but do AWS, openshift or maybe GCP CLIs also supports
shell mode? If so, how it is organized?
19.05.2022 17:53, Aleksandr Pakhomov пишет:
I got it. What do you think about this proposal:
- “ignite” prints help
- “ignite shell” enters REPL
Or
- “ignite” prints help
- “ignite-shell” enters REPL and it is a separate application
I prefer the first varian but I would like to hear opinions of other community
members.
On 19 May 2022, at 01:16, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org> wrote:
I can just have a mistake in my script, e.g. running ignite command
without any parameters. What will happen in such a case from the
script perspective? I think the script will wait for returning value
while the shell will wait for a user input. Due to a server-side
nature of the script it will hang forever because there is no user on
the server side.
