Hi, On Jan 17, 2008 11:28 AM, Thomas Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > copied and used elsewhere > > Do these +350 lines mean completely avoiding version conflicts and > removing one dependency? That would sounds OK to me.
I don't think version conflicts are an issue here, and the dependency would just be replaced with another one. > > using JAXP you can never be sure which parser you actually get > > Trying to support all XML parser implementations and versions sounds a > bit like trying to support all SQL databases to me. What do other > people think about using JAXP? IMHO we don't have a problem with JAXP. See my previous email for details. BR, Jukka Zitting
