Hi,

On Jan 17, 2008 11:57 AM, Felix Meschberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not totally fluent with the state nowadays: But hasn't there been a
> time, that Java 1.4 included a buggy Xerces version, which could only be
> "replaced" by hacking the boot class path ?? I may of course be
> completely wrong.

That may be the case, but we've never seen bug reports about that, so
I don't think this matters to us.

Without seeing actual issues with Jackrabbit and JAXP I think this
parser incompatibility stuff is mostly just FUD.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Reply via email to