> @Niket does it make sense to add the Admin API to this KIP? Thanks Deng for pointing this out. I agree with Jason's suggestion. I will go ahead and add the admin API to this KIP.
- Niket On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:44 AM Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io.invalid> wrote: > > Hello Niket, currently DescribeQuorumResponse is not a public API, we > don’t have a Admin api or shell script to get DescribeQuorumResponse, so > it’s unnecessary to submit a KIP to change it, you can just submit a PR to > accomplish this. > > Hey Ziming, I think it is public. It was documented in KIP-595 and we have > implemented the API on the server. However, it looks like I never added > the Admin API (even though it is assumed by the `kafka-metadata-quorum.sh` > tool). @Niket does it make sense to add the Admin API to this KIP? > > Best, > Jason > > On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 8:09 PM deng ziming <dengziming1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello Niket, currently DescribeQuorumResponse is not a public API, we > > don’t have a Admin api or shell script to get DescribeQuorumResponse, so > > it’s unnecessary to submit a KIP to change it, you can just submit a PR > to > > accomplish this. > > > > -- > > Thanks > > Ziming > > > > > On May 10, 2022, at 1:33 AM, Niket Goel <ng...@confluent.io.INVALID> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I created a KIP to add some more information to > > `DesscribeQuorumResponse` to enable ascertaining voter lag in the quorum > a > > little better. > > > Please see KIP -- > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-836%3A+Additional+Information+in+DescribeQuorumResponse+about+Voter+Lag > > > > > > Thanks for your feedback, > > > Niket Goel > > > > > -- - Niket
