Good idea for the RC1. The branch cut off will stand once the RC1 will be "approved".
Regards JB On Mon 11/07/11 12:43 , Christian Schneider wrote:: Hi JB, +1 for all proposals. Before the 3.0.0 release I think we should do a 3.0.0-RC1 release that people can already test. So I hope we get more feedback for the real 3.0.0. Christian Am 11.07.2011 12:23, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: > Hi all, > > We should now focus on the Karaf 3.0.0 release. I have a set of proposals to > deal with you. > > 1 - Jira > ---------- > As you certainly saw in your mailbox, I started to prepare the Karaf 3.0.0 > roadmap. > > I edited Jira issues to add a fix version and the component. Feel free to > review directly the issues associated to the 3.0.0 release (simply search the > fix version 3.0.0 in Jira). > > We have also: > - Karaf 3.0.1 > - Karaf 3.1.0 > where you can move the issues depending of the severity/priority. > > I would like also to propose some changes in the Jira components. Currently, > the Jira components are not very helpful. I think that we need more > fine-grained components. I propose: > - OBR: all issues related to OBR > - Shell: all issues related to shell display and shell commands (it's > currently console) > - WebConsole: all issues related to the web console > - WebContainer: all issues related to the web container, web deployer, Pax-Web > - Features: all issues related to Karaf features > - WrapDeployer: all issues related to wrap deployer > - KAR: all issues related to KAR artifact and deployer > - OSGi/Runtime: all issues related to bundle installation, OSGi framework, etc > - Cellar: all issues related to Karaf Cellar > > 2 - Subversion > -------------------- > Currently Karaf 3.0.0 is the Karaf trunk. > > I propose: > - to focus on the Jira issues first, that it should be fixed on trunk > - release Karaf 3.0.0 > - when Karaf 3.0.0 is out, I will create the karaf-3.0.x branch, and the > trunk will become Karaf 3.1.0 > > Is it OK for you ? > > 3 - Quality > -------------- > Karaf 3.0.0 is an important release. It's expected by a lot of people and > projects, and for a long time now :) > > It's really important that we insure the highest quality for this release. > It means that I don't wanna rush on this release: I would like that we take a > time to make clean code, deep tests, add the unit tests when it's required, > etc. > > So, no rush, we take the time that we need :) > > Thanks > Regards > JB > > > > > -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect http://www.talend.com
