Hi JB, Excellent ideas that you propose. Here is some light modifications that propose for your list of components
- Repository : All issues related to OBR, Maven, pax mvn configs - Admin : All issues related to 'admin,client,karaf,start,stop' scripts to launch Karaf on W2K, Unix, Mac, SSH, Authenticate/Authorise users, Define log/trace, Debugging, ... - Console : All issues related to shell - commands display - Commands : All issues related to execution commands - Web Console: All issues related to the web console - Web Container: All issues related to the web container, web deployer, Pax-Web - Features: All issues related to Karaf features - Deployer: All issues related to (hot) deployers (wrap, eba, spring, blueprint, bundle, simple jar, kar) - OSGi/Runtime: All issues related to bundle installation, OSGi framework, etc - Cellar: All issues related to Karaf Cellar - Various : All issues related to something else Regards, Charles Moulliard Apache Committer Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard Skype: cmoulliard On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Yes, just a trunk tag is good for the RC1. > > Regards > JB > > On Mon 11/07/11 12:49 , "Jamie G." wrote:: > > +1 for sonar > > I'd just like to leave a reminder to everyone to watch the hudson > builds of trunk: > https://builds.apache.org/job/Karaf/ > > I'd also like to remind everyone to try test builds on as many > platforms as possible (HPUX, AIX, Windows) and report any issues > encountered. > > As to an RC1 -- this would be something we just tag from trunk? > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Christian Schneider > ch...@die-schneider.net> wrote: >> Hi JB, >> >> +1 for all proposals. >> >> Before the 3.0.0 release I think we should do a 3.0.0-RC1 release that >> people can already test. So I hope we get more feedback for the real 3.0.0. >> >> Christian >> >> >> Am 11.07.2011 12:23, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We should now focus on the Karaf 3.0.0 release. I have a set of proposals >>> to deal with you. >>> >>> 1 - Jira >>> ---------- >>> As you certainly saw in your mailbox, I started to prepare the Karaf 3.0.0 >>> roadmap. >>> >>> I edited Jira issues to add a fix version and the component. Feel free to >>> review directly the issues associated to the 3.0.0 release (simply search >>> the fix version 3.0.0 in Jira). >>> >>> We have also: >>> - Karaf 3.0.1 >>> - Karaf 3.1.0 >>> where you can move the issues depending of the severity/priority. >>> >>> I would like also to propose some changes in the Jira components. >>> Currently, the Jira components are not very helpful. I think that we need >>> more fine-grained components. I propose: >>> - OBR: all issues related to OBR >>> - Shell: all issues related to shell display and shell commands (it's >>> currently console) >>> - WebConsole: all issues related to the web console >>> - WebContainer: all issues related to the web container, web deployer, >>> Pax-Web >>> - Features: all issues related to Karaf features >>> - WrapDeployer: all issues related to wrap deployer >>> - KAR: all issues related to KAR artifact and deployer >>> - OSGi/Runtime: all issues related to bundle installation, OSGi framework, >>> etc >>> - Cellar: all issues related to Karaf Cellar >>> >>> 2 - Subversion >>> -------------------- >>> Currently Karaf 3.0.0 is the Karaf trunk. >>> >>> I propose: >>> - to focus on the Jira issues first, that it should be fixed on trunk >>> - release Karaf 3.0.0 >>> - when Karaf 3.0.0 is out, I will create the karaf-3.0.x branch, and the >>> trunk will become Karaf 3.1.0 >>> >>> Is it OK for you ? >>> >>> 3 - Quality >>> -------------- >>> Karaf 3.0.0 is an important release. It's expected by a lot of people and >>> projects, and for a long time now :) >>> >>> It's really important that we insure the highest quality for this release. >>> It means that I don't wanna rush on this release: I would like that we >>> take a time to make clean code, deep tests, add the unit tests when it's >>> required, etc. >>> >>> So, no rush, we take the time that we need :) >>> >>> Thanks >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Christian Schneider >> http://www.liquid-reality.de> >> >> Open Source Architect >> http://www.talend.com> >> >> > > > >
