+1 for the extensions; but one open point here: Do we expect that Cellar will create more componnets in the future? In that case I would propose to name the components:
karaf-repository karaf-admin karaf-console karaf-commands cellar-hazelcast cellar-console ... since both cellar and karaf are easy to type I don't think that this will create any problems but should make it easier to extend it. WDYT? Kind regards, Andreas On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Charles Moulliard <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi JB, > > Excellent ideas that you propose. Here is some light modifications > that propose for your list of components > > - Repository : All issues related to OBR, Maven, pax mvn configs > - Admin : All issues related to 'admin,client,karaf,start,stop' > scripts to launch Karaf on W2K, Unix, Mac, SSH, Authenticate/Authorise > users, Define log/trace, Debugging, ... > - Console : All issues related to shell - commands display > - Commands : All issues related to execution commands > - Web Console: All issues related to the web console > - Web Container: All issues related to the web container, web deployer, > Pax-Web > - Features: All issues related to Karaf features > - Deployer: All issues related to (hot) deployers (wrap, eba, spring, > blueprint, bundle, simple jar, kar) > - OSGi/Runtime: All issues related to bundle installation, OSGi framework, etc > - Cellar: All issues related to Karaf Cellar > - Various : All issues related to something else > > Regards, > > Charles Moulliard > > Apache Committer > > Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard > Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard > Skype: cmoulliard > > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Yes, just a trunk tag is good for the RC1. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Mon 11/07/11 12:49 , "Jamie G." wrote:: >> >> +1 for sonar >> >> I'd just like to leave a reminder to everyone to watch the hudson >> builds of trunk: >> https://builds.apache.org/job/Karaf/ >> >> I'd also like to remind everyone to try test builds on as many >> platforms as possible (HPUX, AIX, Windows) and report any issues >> encountered. >> >> As to an RC1 -- this would be something we just tag from trunk? >> >> Cheers, >> Jamie >> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Christian Schneider >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi JB, >>> >>> +1 for all proposals. >>> >>> Before the 3.0.0 release I think we should do a 3.0.0-RC1 release that >>> people can already test. So I hope we get more feedback for the real 3.0.0. >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> Am 11.07.2011 12:23, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> We should now focus on the Karaf 3.0.0 release. I have a set of proposals >>>> to deal with you. >>>> >>>> 1 - Jira >>>> ---------- >>>> As you certainly saw in your mailbox, I started to prepare the Karaf 3.0.0 >>>> roadmap. >>>> >>>> I edited Jira issues to add a fix version and the component. Feel free to >>>> review directly the issues associated to the 3.0.0 release (simply search >>>> the fix version 3.0.0 in Jira). >>>> >>>> We have also: >>>> - Karaf 3.0.1 >>>> - Karaf 3.1.0 >>>> where you can move the issues depending of the severity/priority. >>>> >>>> I would like also to propose some changes in the Jira components. >>>> Currently, the Jira components are not very helpful. I think that we need >>>> more fine-grained components. I propose: >>>> - OBR: all issues related to OBR >>>> - Shell: all issues related to shell display and shell commands (it's >>>> currently console) >>>> - WebConsole: all issues related to the web console >>>> - WebContainer: all issues related to the web container, web deployer, >>>> Pax-Web >>>> - Features: all issues related to Karaf features >>>> - WrapDeployer: all issues related to wrap deployer >>>> - KAR: all issues related to KAR artifact and deployer >>>> - OSGi/Runtime: all issues related to bundle installation, OSGi framework, >>>> etc >>>> - Cellar: all issues related to Karaf Cellar >>>> >>>> 2 - Subversion >>>> -------------------- >>>> Currently Karaf 3.0.0 is the Karaf trunk. >>>> >>>> I propose: >>>> - to focus on the Jira issues first, that it should be fixed on trunk >>>> - release Karaf 3.0.0 >>>> - when Karaf 3.0.0 is out, I will create the karaf-3.0.x branch, and the >>>> trunk will become Karaf 3.1.0 >>>> >>>> Is it OK for you ? >>>> >>>> 3 - Quality >>>> -------------- >>>> Karaf 3.0.0 is an important release. It's expected by a lot of people and >>>> projects, and for a long time now :) >>>> >>>> It's really important that we insure the highest quality for this release. >>>> It means that I don't wanna rush on this release: I would like that we >>>> take a time to make clean code, deep tests, add the unit tests when it's >>>> required, etc. >>>> >>>> So, no rush, we take the time that we need :) >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Christian Schneider >>> http://www.liquid-reality.de> >>> >>> Open Source Architect >>> http://www.talend.com> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >
