I'm with Andreas here only if the amount of work (Jamie you know best :-) ) is acceptable for a RC that is not only tested from us. Does ServiceMix do a RC yet, is it planned for future releases? Is Geronimo willing to Test with a Karaf RC? Only in that cases I think the work should be put in place.
Regards, Achim 2011/7/11 Andreas Pieber <[email protected]>: > Basically +1; the only question here: does anybody (except of us on > the dev-list) really use/test RCs? > > If yes +1; > otherwise -1 since a releaese (even an RC) is a considerable amount of work > > Just my 2 cents > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Good idea for the RC1. The branch cut off will stand once the RC1 will be >> "approved". >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> >> On Mon 11/07/11 12:43 , Christian Schneider wrote:: >> >> Hi JB, >> >> +1 for all proposals. >> >> Before the 3.0.0 release I think we should do a 3.0.0-RC1 release that >> people can already test. So I hope we get more feedback for the real 3.0.0. >> >> Christian >> >> >> Am 11.07.2011 12:23, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We should now focus on the Karaf 3.0.0 release. I have a set of proposals >>> to deal with you. >>> >>> 1 - Jira >>> ---------- >>> As you certainly saw in your mailbox, I started to prepare the Karaf 3.0.0 >>> roadmap. >>> >>> I edited Jira issues to add a fix version and the component. Feel free to >>> review directly the issues associated to the 3.0.0 release (simply search >>> the fix version 3.0.0 in Jira). >>> >>> We have also: >>> - Karaf 3.0.1 >>> - Karaf 3.1.0 >>> where you can move the issues depending of the severity/priority. >>> >>> I would like also to propose some changes in the Jira components. >>> Currently, the Jira components are not very helpful. I think that we need >>> more fine-grained components. I propose: >>> - OBR: all issues related to OBR >>> - Shell: all issues related to shell display and shell commands (it's >>> currently console) >>> - WebConsole: all issues related to the web console >>> - WebContainer: all issues related to the web container, web deployer, >>> Pax-Web >>> - Features: all issues related to Karaf features >>> - WrapDeployer: all issues related to wrap deployer >>> - KAR: all issues related to KAR artifact and deployer >>> - OSGi/Runtime: all issues related to bundle installation, OSGi framework, >>> etc >>> - Cellar: all issues related to Karaf Cellar >>> >>> 2 - Subversion >>> -------------------- >>> Currently Karaf 3.0.0 is the Karaf trunk. >>> >>> I propose: >>> - to focus on the Jira issues first, that it should be fixed on trunk >>> - release Karaf 3.0.0 >>> - when Karaf 3.0.0 is out, I will create the karaf-3.0.x branch, and the >>> trunk will become Karaf 3.1.0 >>> >>> Is it OK for you ? >>> >>> 3 - Quality >>> -------------- >>> Karaf 3.0.0 is an important release. It's expected by a lot of people and >>> projects, and for a long time now :) >>> >>> It's really important that we insure the highest quality for this release. >>> It means that I don't wanna rush on this release: I would like that we take >>> a time to make clean code, deep tests, add the unit tests when it's >>> required, etc. >>> >>> So, no rush, we take the time that we need :) >>> >>> Thanks >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Christian Schneider >> http://www.liquid-reality.de >> >> Open Source Architect >> http://www.talend.com >> >> >> >> >> > -- -- *Achim Nierbeck* Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead
