hmm, OK, does it really prevent us from actually fixing the version of JAXB in the jre property in conjunction with what Andreas just suggested? I'd really favor changing the jre properties (I actually did that on a project fixing my issues with jaxb this way) and providing functional features out of the box for JAXB since this is still a highly used framework of lots of developers. I really want this to work right away. I myself spent already to much time haunting those nightmares ;)
regards, Achim 2011/8/30 Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com>: > Although it is a little bit otherwise defined in the JRE we may be able to > provide features for those alternatives and completely remove them from the > jre.properties? I think this would help users a lot at various situations > and als remove some of the hacks from SMX :-) > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:37, Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Not sure we should do it for JAXB(and also jaxws). As in most case the >> jaxb/jaxws api(as in JDK6 it use jaxws/jaxb 2.1 but in most case we need use >> 2.2, and also the SPI mechanism of jaxws doesn't work in OSGi container) >> from jdk isn't much useful and so in Servicemix we shipped jaxb api/impl >> bundle and comment it out from jdk, so if customer need use jaxb in karaf, >> he need do a bit hack anyway. >> >> Best Regards >> Freeman >> >> On 2011-8-30, at 下午3:25, Achim Nierbeck wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I suggest we do this also for the jaxb bundles since those are a real pain >>> :) >>> >>> regards, Achim >>> >>> 2011/8/30 Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This commit[1] also do same for JDK1.7. >>>> I'd say other JDK API are quite stable but javax.annotation is a little >>>> bit >>>> different so several other bundles(such as activemq, you can get more >>>> details from [2]) which are popularly used in KARAF are explicitly >>>> specify >>>> javax.annotation import version as 1.1, and since JDK6, the >>>> javax.annotation >>>> is 1.1 compatible, so in this case, if we don't provide this change, >>>> customer need hack the jre.properties themselves. >>>> But for other jdk packages, 3rd party bundle usually just import but >>>> without >>>> specified version, so the default export from system bundle 0 should be >>>> fine >>>> IMHO. >>>> [1]http://svn.apache.org/**viewvc?rev=1162478&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162478&view=rev> >>>> [2]https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/KARAF-835<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-835> >>>> >>>> Best Regards >>>> Freeman >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2011-8-30, at 下午12:30, Andreas Pieber wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm a little bit curious because none of the other exported packages has >>>>> a >>>>> version; I'm basically not against adding versions here, but shouldn't >>>>> we >>>>> do >>>>> the same for 1.5 and 1.7? Is there any way we can easily lookup which >>>>> versions are used by which JRE? >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> Andreas >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:46, <ff...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Author: ffang >>>>>> Date: Sun Aug 28 03:46:53 2011 >>>>>> New Revision: 1162476 >>>>>> >>>>>> URL: >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1162476&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162476&view=rev> >>>>>> Log: >>>>>> [KARAF-840]specify javax.annotation packages version to 1.1.0 for >>>>>> jre-1.6 >>>>>> as Annotation 1.1 Spec is used for Java 6 >>>>>> >>>>>> Modified: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** >>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/**jre.properties >>>>>> >>>>>> Modified: >>>>>> >>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** >>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/**jre.properties >>>>>> URL: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/** >>>>>> assemblies/apache-karaf/src/**main/filtered-resources/etc/** >>>>>> jre.properties?rev=1162476&r1=**1162475&r2=1162476&view=diff<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/assemblies/apache-karaf/src/main/filtered-resources/etc/jre.properties?rev=1162476&r1=1162475&r2=1162476&view=diff> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ==============================**==============================** >>>>>> ================== >>>>>> --- >>>>>> >>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** >>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/**jre.properties >>>>>> (original) >>>>>> +++ >>>>>> >>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** >>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/**jre.properties >>>>>> Sun Aug 28 03:46:53 2011 >>>>>> @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ jre-1.6= \ >>>>>> javax.accessibility, \ >>>>>> javax.activation, \ >>>>>> javax.activity, \ >>>>>> - javax.annotation, \ >>>>>> - javax.annotation.processing, \ >>>>>> + javax.annotation;version="1.1"**, \ >>>>>> + javax.annotation.processing;**version="1.1", \ >>>>>> javax.crypto, \ >>>>>> javax.crypto.interfaces, \ >>>>>> javax.crypto.spec, \ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> ------------------------------**--------------- >>>> Freeman Fang >>>> >>>> FuseSource >>>> Email:ff...@fusesource.com >>>> Web: fusesource.com >>>> Twitter: freemanfang >>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com<http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> *Achim Nierbeck* >>> >>> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>> OPS4J Pax Web >>> <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>> > >>> Committer & Project Lead >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**> >>> >> >> ------------------------------**--------------- >> Freeman Fang >> >> FuseSource >> Email:ff...@fusesource.com >> Web: fusesource.com >> Twitter: freemanfang >> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- -- *Achim Nierbeck* Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
