On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:17, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> hmm, OK, > > does it really prevent us from actually fixing the version of JAXB in > the jre property in conjunction with what Andreas just suggested? > I'd really favor changing the jre properties (I actually did that on a > project fixing my issues with jaxb this way) and providing functional > features > out of the box for JAXB since this is still a highly used framework of > lots of developers. I really want this to work right away. > I myself spent already to much time haunting those nightmares ;) > I'm completely with Achim here (had the same nightmares). Still, if it is 2.2 we're looking for and jdk6 comes with 2.1 using a (default) feature or a default bundle might be the better solution? Kind regards, Andreas > > regards, Achim > > 2011/8/30 Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com>: > > Although it is a little bit otherwise defined in the JRE we may be able > to > > provide features for those alternatives and completely remove them from > the > > jre.properties? I think this would help users a lot at various situations > > and als remove some of the hacks from SMX :-) > > > > Kind regards, > > Andreas > > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:37, Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Not sure we should do it for JAXB(and also jaxws). As in most case the > >> jaxb/jaxws api(as in JDK6 it use jaxws/jaxb 2.1 but in most case we need > use > >> 2.2, and also the SPI mechanism of jaxws doesn't work in OSGi container) > >> from jdk isn't much useful and so in Servicemix we shipped jaxb api/impl > >> bundle and comment it out from jdk, so if customer need use jaxb in > karaf, > >> he need do a bit hack anyway. > >> > >> Best Regards > >> Freeman > >> > >> On 2011-8-30, at 下午3:25, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >>> > >>> I suggest we do this also for the jaxb bundles since those are a real > pain > >>> :) > >>> > >>> regards, Achim > >>> > >>> 2011/8/30 Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> This commit[1] also do same for JDK1.7. > >>>> I'd say other JDK API are quite stable but javax.annotation is a > little > >>>> bit > >>>> different so several other bundles(such as activemq, you can get more > >>>> details from [2]) which are popularly used in KARAF are explicitly > >>>> specify > >>>> javax.annotation import version as 1.1, and since JDK6, the > >>>> javax.annotation > >>>> is 1.1 compatible, so in this case, if we don't provide this change, > >>>> customer need hack the jre.properties themselves. > >>>> But for other jdk packages, 3rd party bundle usually just import but > >>>> without > >>>> specified version, so the default export from system bundle 0 should > be > >>>> fine > >>>> IMHO. > >>>> [1]http://svn.apache.org/**viewvc?rev=1162478&view=rev< > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162478&view=rev> > >>>> [2]https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/KARAF-835< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-835> > >>>> > >>>> Best Regards > >>>> Freeman > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 2011-8-30, at 下午12:30, Andreas Pieber wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I'm a little bit curious because none of the other exported packages > has > >>>>> a > >>>>> version; I'm basically not against adding versions here, but > shouldn't > >>>>> we > >>>>> do > >>>>> the same for 1.5 and 1.7? Is there any way we can easily lookup which > >>>>> versions are used by which JRE? > >>>>> > >>>>> Kind regards, > >>>>> Andreas > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:46, <ff...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Author: ffang > >>>>>> Date: Sun Aug 28 03:46:53 2011 > >>>>>> New Revision: 1162476 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1162476&view=rev< > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162476&view=rev> > >>>>>> Log: > >>>>>> [KARAF-840]specify javax.annotation packages version to 1.1.0 for > >>>>>> jre-1.6 > >>>>>> as Annotation 1.1 Spec is used for Java 6 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Modified: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** > >>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/**jre.properties > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Modified: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** > >>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/**jre.properties > >>>>>> URL: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/** > >>>>>> assemblies/apache-karaf/src/**main/filtered-resources/etc/** > >>>>>> jre.properties?rev=1162476&r1=**1162475&r2=1162476&view=diff< > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/assemblies/apache-karaf/src/main/filtered-resources/etc/jre.properties?rev=1162476&r1=1162475&r2=1162476&view=diff > > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ==============================**==============================** > >>>>>> ================== > >>>>>> --- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** > >>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/**jre.properties > >>>>>> (original) > >>>>>> +++ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** > >>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/**jre.properties > >>>>>> Sun Aug 28 03:46:53 2011 > >>>>>> @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ jre-1.6= \ > >>>>>> javax.accessibility, \ > >>>>>> javax.activation, \ > >>>>>> javax.activity, \ > >>>>>> - javax.annotation, \ > >>>>>> - javax.annotation.processing, \ > >>>>>> + javax.annotation;version="1.1"**, \ > >>>>>> + javax.annotation.processing;**version="1.1", \ > >>>>>> javax.crypto, \ > >>>>>> javax.crypto.interfaces, \ > >>>>>> javax.crypto.spec, \ > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> ------------------------------**--------------- > >>>> Freeman Fang > >>>> > >>>> FuseSource > >>>> Email:ff...@fusesource.com > >>>> Web: fusesource.com > >>>> Twitter: freemanfang > >>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com< > http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> -- > >>> *Achim Nierbeck* > >>> > >>> > >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/< > http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > >>> > > >>> Committer & Project Lead > >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**> > >>> > >> > >> ------------------------------**--------------- > >> Freeman Fang > >> > >> FuseSource > >> Email:ff...@fusesource.com > >> Web: fusesource.com > >> Twitter: freemanfang > >> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com < > http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > -- > *Achim Nierbeck* > > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer & Project Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >
