On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:40, Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think hack jre.properties can support jaxb2.2 and create a default > feature which contain smx jaxb bundles should be the solution. > > But I have little concern that this will make karaf more like smx and this > actually is against our initial idea that keep karaf as a simple general > container. > I think nobody wants to make SMX out of Karaf. We just want to find a way to make it easy to use JAXB (and frameworks such as CXF) on Karaf without any modifications at its core... Kind regards, Andreas > > Regards > > Freeman > > > On 2011-8-30, at 下午7:32, Andreas Pieber wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:17, Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com>** >> wrote: >> >> hmm, OK, >>> >>> does it really prevent us from actually fixing the version of JAXB in >>> the jre property in conjunction with what Andreas just suggested? >>> I'd really favor changing the jre properties (I actually did that on a >>> project fixing my issues with jaxb this way) and providing functional >>> features >>> out of the box for JAXB since this is still a highly used framework of >>> lots of developers. I really want this to work right away. >>> I myself spent already to much time haunting those nightmares ;) >>> >>> >> I'm completely with Achim here (had the same nightmares). Still, if it is >> 2.2 we're looking for and jdk6 comes with 2.1 using a (default) feature or >> a >> default bundle might be the better solution? >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> >> >>> regards, Achim >>> >>> 2011/8/30 Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Although it is a little bit otherwise defined in the JRE we may be able >>>> >>> to >>> >>>> provide features for those alternatives and completely remove them from >>>> >>> the >>> >>>> jre.properties? I think this would help users a lot at various >>>> situations >>>> and als remove some of the hacks from SMX :-) >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Andreas >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:37, Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Not sure we should do it for JAXB(and also jaxws). As in most case the >>>>> jaxb/jaxws api(as in JDK6 it use jaxws/jaxb 2.1 but in most case we >>>>> need >>>>> >>>> use >>> >>>> 2.2, and also the SPI mechanism of jaxws doesn't work in OSGi container) >>>>> from jdk isn't much useful and so in Servicemix we shipped jaxb >>>>> api/impl >>>>> bundle and comment it out from jdk, so if customer need use jaxb in >>>>> >>>> karaf, >>> >>>> he need do a bit hack anyway. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards >>>>> Freeman >>>>> >>>>> On 2011-8-30, at 下午3:25, Achim Nierbeck wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I suggest we do this also for the jaxb bundles since those are a real >>>>>> >>>>> pain >>> >>>> :) >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011/8/30 Freeman Fang <freeman.f...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This commit[1] also do same for JDK1.7. >>>>>>> I'd say other JDK API are quite stable but javax.annotation is a >>>>>>> >>>>>> little >>> >>>> bit >>>>>>> different so several other bundles(such as activemq, you can get more >>>>>>> details from [2]) which are popularly used in KARAF are explicitly >>>>>>> specify >>>>>>> javax.annotation import version as 1.1, and since JDK6, the >>>>>>> javax.annotation >>>>>>> is 1.1 compatible, so in this case, if we don't provide this change, >>>>>>> customer need hack the jre.properties themselves. >>>>>>> But for other jdk packages, 3rd party bundle usually just import but >>>>>>> without >>>>>>> specified version, so the default export from system bundle 0 should >>>>>>> >>>>>> be >>> >>>> fine >>>>>>> IMHO. >>>>>>> [1]http://svn.apache.org/****viewvc?rev=1162478&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/**viewvc?rev=1162478&view=rev> >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1162478&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162478&view=rev> >>> > >>> >>>> [2]https://issues.apache.org/****jira/browse/KARAF-835<https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/KARAF-835> >>>>>>> < >>>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/KARAF-835<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-835> >>> > >>> >>>> >>>>>>> Best Regards >>>>>>> Freeman >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2011-8-30, at 下午12:30, Andreas Pieber wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm a little bit curious because none of the other exported packages >>>>>>> >>>>>> has >>> >>>> a >>>>>>>> version; I'm basically not against adding versions here, but >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> shouldn't >>> >>>> we >>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>> the same for 1.5 and 1.7? Is there any way we can easily lookup >>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>> versions are used by which JRE? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 05:46, <ff...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Author: ffang >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Date: Sun Aug 28 03:46:53 2011 >>>>>>>>> New Revision: 1162476 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> URL: >>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?****rev=1162476&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1162476&view=rev> >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**rev=1162476&view=rev<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1162476&view=rev> >>> > >>> >>>> Log: >>>>>>>>> [KARAF-840]specify javax.annotation packages version to 1.1.0 for >>>>>>>>> jre-1.6 >>>>>>>>> as Annotation 1.1 Spec is used for Java 6 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/****assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** >>>>>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/****jre.properties >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/****assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** >>>>>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/****jre.properties >>>>>>>>> URL: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/****karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/**> >>>>>>>>> assemblies/apache-karaf/src/****main/filtered-resources/etc/** >>>>>>>>> jre.properties?rev=1162476&r1=**1162475&r2=1162476&**view=diff< >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/**karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/** >>> assemblies/apache-karaf/src/**main/filtered-resources/etc/** >>> jre.properties?rev=1162476&r1=**1162475&r2=1162476&view=diff<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/assemblies/apache-karaf/src/main/filtered-resources/etc/jre.properties?rev=1162476&r1=1162475&r2=1162476&view=diff> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ==============================****============================** >>>>>>>>> ==** >>>>>>>>> ================== >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/****assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** >>>>>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/****jre.properties >>>>>>>>> (original) >>>>>>>>> +++ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> karaf/branches/karaf-2.2.x/****assemblies/apache-karaf/src/** >>>>>>>>> main/filtered-resources/etc/****jre.properties >>>>>>>>> Sun Aug 28 03:46:53 2011 >>>>>>>>> @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ jre-1.6= \ >>>>>>>>> javax.accessibility, \ >>>>>>>>> javax.activation, \ >>>>>>>>> javax.activity, \ >>>>>>>>> - javax.annotation, \ >>>>>>>>> - javax.annotation.processing, \ >>>>>>>>> + javax.annotation;version="1.1"****, \ >>>>>>>>> + javax.annotation.processing;****version="1.1", \ >>>>>>>>> javax.crypto, \ >>>>>>>>> javax.crypto.interfaces, \ >>>>>>>>> javax.crypto.spec, \ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------****--------------- >>>>>>> Freeman Fang >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FuseSource >>>>>>> Email:ff...@fusesource.com >>>>>>> Web: fusesource.com >>>>>>> Twitter: freemanfang >>>>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.****com< >>>>>>> >>>>>> http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com>> >>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Achim Nierbeck* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web >>>>>> <http://wiki.ops4j.org/****display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>> < >>>>>> >>>>> http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/**paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>> > >>> >>>> >>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/****<http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**> >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------****--------------- >>>>> Freeman Fang >>>>> >>>>> FuseSource >>>>> Email:ff...@fusesource.com >>>>> Web: fusesource.com >>>>> Twitter: freemanfang >>>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.****com < >>>>> >>>> http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com>> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> *Achim Nierbeck* >>> >>> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>> OPS4J Pax Web >>> <http://wiki.ops4j.org/**display/paxweb/Pax+Web/<http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>> > >>> Committer & Project Lead >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/**> >>> >>> > ------------------------------**--------------- > > Freeman Fang > > FuseSource > Email:ff...@fusesource.com > Web: fusesource.com > Twitter: freemanfang > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.**com <http://freemanfang.blogspot.com> > > > > > > > > > >
