Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
Frank et al.,
We need to know if we should roll back the changes listed
above that were introduced with m57 (this does not apply
to the relevant content changes, just the changes
listed above).
*It's important that we get feedback by tomorrow, or else
our deadline fort the last help cws runs out*
I agree with Andre, especially as a lot of teams work from Pootle; as
I updated from m54 to m55 and then m56, as far as I remember, m55 to
m56 has no changes in strings, and m54 to m55 only some, so reverting
this help cws in m57 for the time being would probably be the best
idea.
If in this short time the help team can go through the changes
included in this CWS and extract those that really change and enrich
help content (content-wise, by explaining new features etc.) or
correct appalling mistakes, you may try to create a sister CWS with
those changes but without 6- and 9-blanks added and tags changed - and
get it in 3.2. If that is not doable in this time-frame, let this CWS
be reworked on and included on the road to 3.3 (the sooner the
better).
If you can revert this CWS in m58, and then update Pootle from m54 to
m58, most of language teams will think nothing strange happened at all
on the road to 3.2 ;)
We cannot roll back the complete CWS. It is in m57. I will compile
a diff and then have writers go through the list and
roll back unrequired changes and have those in a CWS targeted
for the next milestone (m58 or m59).
I guess that skipping m57 for updating helpcontent2 in pootle
and then using the milestone in which the correcting CWS was
integrated would fix the issue?
Rafella, is that possible?
Frank
--
Frank Peters x66757
Learning and Publications Manager
SLS - CCLS Application Services
Office Productivity & Communication Suite
Sun Microsystems, Hamburg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@l10n.openoffice.org
