Hi eleonora, > I don't know who dreamed up this "all language" dictionary but
I don't know that myself. ^^ > I think > it's one of the most facile, imbecilic ideas I've heard in a very long > time. Have the developers nothing better to do with their time? Not exactly (remember that it is only about user-dictionaries, not about default hunspell dictionaries). For example if you have a look in the user-dictionary named 'sun', then you will find the following words: - Adabas - OpenOffice.org - Webcast ... It is a very convenient way to make sure that e.g. 'OpenOffice.org' will always be regarded as correct even though it may not be part in any hunspell dicitonary. 'Langugae-all' dictionaries do make sense to customize upon the existing hunspell dictionaries. That they get either used/created by the provider (here as part of OOo) or by the user himself. On the other hand, as already mentioned elsewhere, I don't think they do make much sense as regular dictionary source for the spell checker. They should be maintained only by the provider or user. And the only reason for me asking for hunspell support for them is to allow for a implementation change of the user-dictionary format to one directly readable by hunspell. This is purely to not loose functionality when changing the format. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
