On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, at 09:03, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 07:55, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> As far as the worktree stuff goes, I’d be in favor of that if it can be used >> to solve the issues Piotr mentions where Log4j-Scala and Log4j-Kotlin need >> to be independently committed and merged, although I have a suspicion that >> the ASF web site support would work better if those were in their own repos >> as I have my doubts they support worktrees. > > INFRA does not care about worktrees. Their code is probably something > like: if any `logging-*` repo pushed branch 'lala' that contains an > `.asf.yaml` file with:
It matches the repo name to the project, i.e. logging-site -> logging project logging.staged.a.o logging-log4j-site -> also logging project, logging.staged.a.o With the profiles, you can manage subdomains profile: ~ -> logging.s.a.o directly profile: main - > logging-main.logging.s.a.o