On 4/26/10 7:57 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com <mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com>> wrote: I still don't like "just seeing what happens". What we all agree should be best for users as well as devs is not always going to be in alignment with letting the chips fall where they may. I don't think seeing whether committers just do something individually/naturally is a good test for whether we have the right goals for the project. Committers don't have to do anything at all. Please remember, Lucene isn't a commercial product, its an open source project.
It's not that simple. If you want to commit a patch without having it reverted, you *do* have to do certain things - currently, you have to attempt back compat. Or don't commit. You guys seem to think its a free for all. Its obviously not. Their are general guidelines we all follow, formed by consensus. Committers are not just doing whatever they want.
-- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
