[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867709#action_12867709 ]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2167: ------------------------------------- bq. However, I think Lao had zero tokens output, so if you just import the Lao test from TestICUTokenizer you should see the issue. Ok, I will take a look. The algorithm there has some handling for incorrectly ordered unicode, for example combining characters before the base form when they should be after... so it might be no problem at all > Implement StandardTokenizer with the UAX#29 Standard > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-2167 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2167 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: contrib/analyzers > Affects Versions: 3.1 > Reporter: Shyamal Prasad > Assignee: Steven Rowe > Priority: Minor > Attachments: LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch, > LUCENE-2167.patch, LUCENE-2167.patch > > Original Estimate: 0.5h > Remaining Estimate: 0.5h > > It would be really nice for StandardTokenizer to adhere straight to the > standard as much as we can with jflex. Then its name would actually make > sense. > Such a transition would involve renaming the old StandardTokenizer to > EuropeanTokenizer, as its javadoc claims: > bq. This should be a good tokenizer for most European-language documents > The new StandardTokenizer could then say > bq. This should be a good tokenizer for most languages. > All the english/euro-centric stuff like the acronym/company/apostrophe stuff > can stay with that EuropeanTokenizer, and it could be used by the european > analyzers. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org