Is the benchmark just trying to measure speedups by using DirectPF vs the default PF? You could do this today w/ luceneutil (using Wikipedia as content).
But if you have another content source / index, I'm happy to run the benchmark. It'd be easier to make the content available (CSV, or line docs file format), then ship around big indices ... I have a box with 48 GB RAM. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some of you may recall that I started a thread some time ago about > wishing for the benefits of the direct posting format without needing > to use a codec. The thread landed as a challenge: show a benchmark of > the benefit of D-P-F. > > After a lot of distraction, I'm now in a position to build it. The > core is a rather large index, and to show the effect (always assuming > that I succeed) will take a machine with a large amount of RAM. > > One approach is for me to simply build the index involved and make it > available as an index. Another would be to side-step into a giant pile > of CSV or JSON and provide a do-it-yourself kit. > > Anyone have a preference? > > What have we got for hardware with, 40G of RAM? Anything, or will this > be up to individuals to try out on dayjob hardware? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
