On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My takeaway from the prior conversation was that various people didn't > entirely believe that I'd seen a dramatic improvement in query perfo > using D-P-F, and so would not smile upon a patch intended to liberate > D-P-F from codecs. It could be that the effect I saw has to do with > the fact that our system depends on hitting and scoring 50% of the > documents in an index with a lot of documents. > I dont understand the word "liberate" here. why is it such a problem that this is a codec? i do not think we should give it any more status than that, it wastes too much ram. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
